1.0.0.3falseACCOUNTING POLICIESfalse1$falsefalseiso4217_USDStandardhttp://www.xbrl.org/2003/iso4217USDiso42170iso4217_USD_per_sharesDividehttp://www.xbrl.org/2003/iso4217USDiso4217http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instanceshares0sharesStandardhttp://www.xbrl.org/2003/instanceshares053us-gaap_OrganizationConsolidationAndPresentationOfFinancialStatementsDisclosureTextBlockus-gaaptruenadurationstringNo definition available.falsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalse1falsefalse00<div>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 6px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px" align="center"></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 6px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px" align="center">
<font style="FONT-FAMILY: ARIAL" size="2"><u>NOTE
1    ACCOUNTING POLICIES</u></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 18px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px"><font style="FONT-FAMILY: ARIAL" size="2"><b>Basis of
Presentation</b></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 12px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px" align="justify">
<font style="FONT-FAMILY: ARIAL" size="2">In the opinion of
management, the accompanying balance sheets and related interim
statements of income, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity
include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items,
necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(“U.S. GAAP”). Preparing financial statements requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses.
Examples include: estimates of loss contingencies, product
warranties, product life cycles, product returns, and stock-based
compensation forfeiture rates; assumptions such as the elements
comprising a software arrangement, including the distinction
between upgrades/enhancements and new products; when technological
feasibility is achieved for our products; the potential outcome of
future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our
financial statements or tax returns; estimating the fair value
and/or goodwill impairment for our reporting units; and determining
when investment impairments are other-than-temporary. Actual
results and outcomes may differ from management’s estimates
and assumptions.</font></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 12px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px" align="justify">
<font style="FONT-FAMILY: ARIAL" size="2">Interim results are not
necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The information
included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with
information included in the Microsoft Corporation 2009
Form 10-K filed on July 30, 2009 with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission.</font></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 18px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px"><font style="FONT-FAMILY: ARIAL" size="2"><b>Principles of
Consolidation</b></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 12px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px" align="justify">
<font style="FONT-FAMILY: ARIAL" size="2">The financial statements
include the accounts of Microsoft Corporation and its subsidiaries.
Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Equity
investments through which we exercise significant influence but do
not exercise control and are not the primary beneficiary are
accounted for using the equity method. Investments through which we
are not able to exercise significant influence over the investee
and which do not have readily determinable fair values are
accounted for under the cost method.</font></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 18px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px"><font style="FONT-FAMILY: ARIAL" size="2"><b>Subsequent Events</b></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 12px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px" align="justify">
<font style="FONT-FAMILY: ARIAL" size="2">We evaluated events
occurring between the end of our fiscal quarter, December 31,
2009 and January 28, 2010 when the financial statements were
issued.</font></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 18px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px"><font style="FONT-FAMILY: ARIAL" size="2"><b>Recently Adopted Accounting
Guidance</b></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 12px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px" align="justify">
<font style="FONT-FAMILY: ARIAL" size="2">On July 1, 2009, we
adopted guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) on business combinations. The guidance retains
the fundamental requirements that the acquisition method of
accounting (previously referred to as the purchase method of
accounting) be used for all business combinations, but requires a
number of changes, including changes in the way assets and
liabilities are recognized and measured as a result of business
combinations. It also requires the capitalization of in-process
research and development at fair value and requires the expensing
of acquisition-related costs as incurred. We have applied this
guidance to business combinations completed since July 1,
2009.</font></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 12px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px" align="justify">
<font style="FONT-FAMILY: ARIAL" size="2">On July 1, 2009, we
adopted the guidance issued by the FASB that changes the accounting
and reporting for non-controlling interests. Non-controlling
interests are to be reported as a component of equity separate from
the parent’s equity, and purchases or sales of equity
interests that do not result in a change in control are to be
accounted for as equity transactions. In addition, net income
attributable to a non-controlling interest is to be included in net
income and, upon a loss of control, the interest sold, as well as
any interest retained, is to be recorded at fair value with any
gain or loss recognized in net income. Adoption of the new guidance
did not have a material impact on our financial
statements.</font></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 12px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px" align="justify">
<font style="FONT-FAMILY: ARIAL" size="2">On July 1, 2009, we
adopted the guidance on fair value measurement for nonfinancial
assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring
basis (at least annually). Adoption of the new guidance did not
have a material impact on our financial statements.</font></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px"><font size="1"> </font></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px"><font style="FONT-FAMILY: ARIAL" size="2"><b>Recent Accounting Guidance Not Yet
Adopted</b></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 12px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px" align="justify">
<font style="FONT-FAMILY: ARIAL" size="2">In January 2010, the FASB
issued guidance to amend the disclosure requirements related to
recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The guidance
requires new disclosures on the transfers of assets and liabilities
between Level 1 (quoted prices in active market for identical
assets or liabilities) and Level 2 (significant other observable
inputs) of the fair value measurement hierarchy, including the
reasons and the timing of the transfers. Additionally, the guidance
requires a roll forward of activities on purchases, sales,
issuance, and settlements of the assets and liabilities measured
using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 fair value
measurements). The guidance will become effective for us with the
reporting period beginning January 1, 2010, except for the
disclosure on the roll forward activities for Level 3 fair value
measurements, which will become effective for us with the reporting
period beginning July 1, 2011. Other than requiring additional
disclosures, adoption of this new guidance will not have a material
impact on our financial statements.</font></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 12px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px" align="justify">
<font style="FONT-FAMILY: ARIAL" size="2">In October 2009, the FASB
issued guidance on revenue recognition that will become effective
for us beginning July 1, 2010, with earlier adoption
permitted. Under the new guidance on arrangements that include
software elements, tangible products that have software components
that are essential to the functionality of the tangible product
will no longer be within the scope of the software revenue
recognition guidance, and software-enabled products will now be
subject to other relevant revenue recognition guidance.
Additionally, the FASB issued guidance on revenue arrangements with
multiple deliverables that are outside the scope of the software
revenue recognition guidance. Under the new guidance, when vendor
specific objective evidence or third party evidence for
deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined, a best
estimate of the selling price is required to separate deliverables
and allocate arrangement consideration using the relative selling
price method. The new guidance includes new disclosure requirements
on how the application of the relative selling price method affects
the timing and amount of revenue recognition. We believe adoption
of this new guidance will not have a material impact on our
financial statements.</font></p>
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 12px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px" align="justify">
<font style="FONT-FAMILY: ARIAL" size="2">In June 2009, the FASB
issued guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities,
which is effective for us beginning July 1, 2010. The new
guidance requires revised evaluations of whether entities represent
variable interest entities, ongoing assessments of control over
such entities, and additional disclosures for variable interests.
We believe adoption of this new guidance will not have a material
impact on our financial statements.</font></p>
</div>NOTE
1    ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of
Presentation
In the opinion of
management, the accompanying balance sheets and relatedfalsefalseNo definition available.No authoritative reference available.falsefalse11falseUnKnownUnKnownUnKnownfalsetrue