Exhibit 1.01

Conflict Minerals Report
of NVIDIA Corporation
for the Calendar Year Ended December 31, 2019


This Conflict Minerals Report of NVIDIA Corporation, a Delaware corporation, is being filed for the calendar year ended December 31, 2019 in compliance with Rule 13p-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

Because conflict minerals were necessary to the functionality or production of products contracted by us to be manufactured between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019, or the Reporting Period, we were required to conduct in good faith a reasonable country of origin inquiry, or RCOI, regarding those conflict minerals that is reasonably designed to determine whether any of the conflict minerals originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country, which we refer to collectively as the Covered Countries, or are from recycled or scrap sources. “Conflict minerals” are defined in Item 1.01(d)(3) of the Specialized Disclosure Report on Form SD, or the Form SD, as columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite, gold, wolframite, or their derivatives, which are limited to tantalum, tin, and tungsten, or collectively, 3TG.

Based on the RCOI, if we have reason to believe our necessary conflict minerals may have originated in the Covered Countries and have reason to believe that they may not be from recycled or scrap sources, we must exercise due diligence on the source and chain of custody of our conflict minerals, and file a Conflict Minerals Report to describe our due diligence efforts on the source and chain of custody of such 3TG.

OUR COMPANY

NVIDIA pioneered accelerated computing to help solve the most challenging computational problems. Starting with a focus on PC graphics, we extended our focus in recent years to the revolutionary field of artificial intelligence, or AI. Fueled by the sustained demand for exceptional 3D graphics and the scale of the gaming market, NVIDIA leveraged its GPU architecture to create platforms for virtual reality, high performance computing, or HPC, and AI.

The GPU was initially used to simulate human imagination, enabling the virtual worlds of video games and films. Today, it also simulates human intelligence, enabling a deeper understanding of the physical world. Its parallel processing capabilities, supported by up to thousands of computing cores, are essential to running deep learning algorithms. This form of AI, in which software writes itself by learning from data, can serve as the brain of computers, robots and self-driving cars that can perceive and understand the world. GPU-powered deep learning continues to be adopted by thousands of enterprises to deliver services and features that would have been impossible with traditional coding.

NVIDIA has a platform strategy, bringing together hardware, system software, programmable algorithms, libraries, systems, and services to create unique value for the markets we serve. While the requirements of these end markets are diverse, we address them with a unified underlying architecture leveraging our GPUs and software stacks. The programmable nature of our architecture allows us to support several multi-billion-dollar end markets with the same underlying technology by using a variety of software stacks developed either internally or by third party developers and partners. The large and growing number of developers across our platforms strengthens our ecosystem and increases the value of our platform to our customers.

We do not directly manufacture semiconductors used for our products. Instead, we utilize a fabless manufacturing strategy, whereby we employ world-class suppliers for all phases of the manufacturing process, including wafer fabrication, assembly, testing, and packaging. This strategy uses the expertise of industry-leading suppliers that are certified by the International Organization for Standardization in such areas as fabrication, assembly, quality control and assurance, reliability, and testing. Additionally, we can avoid many of the significant costs and risks associated with owning and operating manufacturing operations. While we may directly procure certain raw materials used in the production of our products, such as substrates and a variety of components, our suppliers are responsible for procurement of the majority of the raw materials used in the production of our products. As a result, we can focus our resources on product design, additional quality assurance, marketing, and customer support.





FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Conflict Minerals Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are subject to the “safe harbor” created by those sections. Forward-looking statements are based on our management's beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “goal,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “project,” “predict,” “potential,” “intend” and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance, time frames or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, time frames or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We discuss many of these risks, uncertainties and other factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q in greater detail under the heading “Risk Factors.” Given these risks, uncertainties and other factors, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also, these forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this filing. You should read this Conflict Minerals Report completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We hereby qualify our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future. All references to “NVIDIA,” “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company” mean NVIDIA Corporation and its subsidiaries, except where it is made clear that the term means only the parent company.

OUR COMMITMENT TO RESPONSIBLE SOURCING

We support, contribute to, and rely on industry-wide efforts to validate the source of minerals used in our products, ensuring that they come from socially responsible sources and do not contribute to human conflict. We’re a member of the Responsible Minerals Initiative, or RMI, and the Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade. Additionally, we participate in various RMI work groups and align our program with the organization’s tracking of additional minerals and materials and with geographic areas of high concern. We support these on-the-ground programs aimed at improving transparency for responsible sourcing and reducing human rights risks.

Our goal is to use only conflict-free 3TG from the Covered Countries in our products. Our due diligence program regarding conflict materials is designed to conform in all material respects with the framework recommended by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, or OECD.

DUE DILIGENCE PROGRAM DESIGN

Our conflict minerals due diligence program is designed to conform in all material respects with the framework recommended by the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, or the OECD Guidance, as it relates to our supply chain position as a “downstream” purchaser. Summarized below are the components of our program as they relate to the five-step framework set forth in the OECD Guidance:

Step 1: Establish strong company management systems

•
Adopted and publicly communicated a company-wide Corporate Social Responsibility Directive, in which we declare that we abide by the Code of Conduct of the Responsible Business Alliance, or RBA, including the standard regarding responsible sourcing of conflict minerals, which can be found on our website at https://www.nvidia.com/content/dam/en-zz/Solutions/about-us/documents/nvidia-corporate-responsibility-directive.pdf
•
As a member of the RBA, required that our suppliers and contract manufacturers acknowledge and implement the RBA’s Code of Conduct, which includes an obligation to conduct due diligence regarding conflict minerals
•
Adopted and publicly communicated a conflict minerals policy endorsed by our Executive Vice President, Operations, which is posted on our website at http://images.nvidia.com/content/includes/gcr/pdf/nvidia-conflict-minerals-policy.pdf
•
Assembled an internal conflict minerals team, with representation by NVIDIA’s Operations (covering Silicon Products and System-Level Products groups), Legal, Sales, Procurement, Internal Audit and Corporate Responsibility departments
•
Established a system of control and transparency over our conflict minerals supply chain by engaging first-tier and second-tier suppliers and requesting relevant information through the use of a third-party supplier




management vendor which utilized due diligence tools created by the RMI, including the conflict minerals reporting template, or the CMRT, of the RMI
•
Provided at least quarterly updates on our conflict minerals due diligence progress and status to our Executive Vice President, Operations
•
Maintained an independent corporate hotline to allow any employee to confidentially and anonymously lodge a complaint about any matter of concern, including those related to conflict minerals (unless prohibited by local privacy laws for employees located in the European Union)

Step 2: Identify and assess risk in the supply chain

•
Identified relevant suppliers that supplied products containing 3TG by reference to bills of materials
•
Requested such suppliers to provide information regarding smelters or refiners in our supply chain by using the CMRT
•
Reviewed supplier responses for completeness and accuracy
•
Compared information in supplier responses with the list of 3TG processing facilities that received a “compliant” designation, produced by the Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, or RMAP, of the RMI
•
Contacted non-responsive suppliers, requesting their responses
•
Provided suppliers with feedback on responses containing errors, inconsistencies, or incomplete information
•
Required potential new suppliers to complete a CMRT for diligence review and risk ranking

Step 3: Design and implement a strategy to respond to identified risks

•
Reported progress on at least a quarterly basis to our Executive Vice President, Operations
•
Identified main risks in our supply chain
•
Contacted certain smelter and refinery facilities that have not received a “compliant” designation from an independent third-party audit program to encourage their participation
•
Implemented a risk mitigation response plan to monitor and track unresponsive suppliers and/or incomplete or inaccurate supply chain information
•
Reviewed and compared the list of smelters in our supplier base against Office of Foreign Assets Control-sanctioned countries and Specially Designated Nationals
•
Requested that certain suppliers remove specific smelters or refiners from their supply chain that we deemed to be high-risk
•
Informed non-responsive suppliers that we will assess, and potentially withhold, future business with them if they do not acquire materials from conflict-free sources within the Covered Countries and do not provide their supply chain conflict minerals information to us using the CMRT
•
Removed companies from our supplier base due, in part, to their failure to comply with our conflict minerals policy
•
Conducted meetings with certain customers and responded to their specific concerns and requests

Step 4: Carry out independent third-party audit of supply chain due diligence at identified points in the supply chain

•
Relied on the RMAP, the London Bullion Market Association, and the Responsible Jewellery Council to coordinate third-party audits of smelters and refiners to validate the sourcing practices of such facilities in our supply chain
•
Provided indirect financial support for such third-party audits through our continued membership in the RBA and RMI
•
Participated in RBA work groups, including smelter engagement and outreach





Step 5: Report on supply chain due diligence

•
Adopted and publicly communicated a conflict minerals company policy endorsed by our Executive Vice President, Operations, which is posted on our website at http://images.nvidia.com/content/includes/gcr/pdf/nvidia-conflict-minerals-policy.pdf
•
Published conflict minerals information in our annual corporate social responsibility report, which is posted on our website at https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/csr/
•
Filed our Form SD for the reporting period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019, including this Conflict Minerals Report, with the Securities Exchange Commission and made it available on the Investor Relations page of our website at http://investor.nvidia.com/sec.cfm
•
Reported supply chain smelter information in this Conflict Minerals Report

The contents of any website referenced in this Conflict Minerals Report are not a part of this Conflict Minerals Report.

REASONABLE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INQUIRY (RCOI)

NVIDIA’s supply chain is complex and there are multiple tiers between NVIDIA and the actual mining of the 3TG. Because we utilize a fabless manufacturing strategy, we must rely on our suppliers and component manufacturers, including sub-tier suppliers, to provide us with information on the origin of the 3TG contained in our products and product components.

To conduct our RCOI, we identified our suppliers and component manufacturers of products manufactured during the Reporting Period, and requested that they each provide NVIDIA with a list of the smelters and refiners associated with the 3TG in their products and components via the CMRT. Our goal was to determine whether any 3TG in our products or components originated in the Covered Countries. One hundred percent of our suppliers and component manufacturers responded with the requested information, and we compared their responses with the RCOI data provided by the RMAP.

Our RCOI revealed that, of the 284 worldwide processing facilities in our supply chain which sourced 3TG for our products contracted to be manufactured during the Reporting Period, 43 smelters and refiners were identified by the RMI as sourcing from the Covered Countries and were not solely from recycled or scrap sources. Therefore, we believe that a portion of the 3TG contained in our products or components originated in the Covered Countries, and we are filing this Conflict Minerals Report accordingly.

DESCRIPTION OF DUE DILIGENCE MEASURES PERFORMED

Below is a description of the measures we performed for this Reporting Period to exercise due diligence on the source and chain of custody of our necessary conflict minerals.

We requested supply chain information from one hundred percent of our direct suppliers that may use necessary 3TG in our products and components to determine whether any of these minerals originated in the Covered Countries or were from recycled or scrap sources. We used third-party supplier management software to track these communications with direct suppliers, automate the identification of quality issues, aggregate CMRT responses for analysis and reporting, and perform additional follow up with those suppliers whose CMRTs contained incomplete or potentially inaccurate information. After reviewing the names provided by our suppliers and component manufacturers against the RMI lists of verified smelters and refiners, we consulted with our RMI colleagues to distinguish those that were actual smelters and refiners from other participants in the upstream supply chain, such as brokers and traders. We provided our list of smelters and refiners for inclusion in the RMAP, which utilized an independent third party to conduct audits, according to the standards of the OECD Guidance, of willing smelters and refiners to determine the source and origin of their ore, as well as whether they were conflict-free.
 
COUNTRY AND MINE OR LOCATION OF ORIGIN OF NECESSARY CONFLICT MINERALS

Based on the due diligence described above, we determined that the supply chain for our products contracted to be manufactured during the Reporting Period sourced conflict minerals from up to 284 processing facilities worldwide, of which, as of May 5, 2020:

•
237 have been validated by the RMAP as “compliant,” including all 43 smelters and refiners which were identified by the RMI as sourcing from the Covered Countries;





•
Four are “active” as defined by the RMAP and in the process of being audited by an independent third party;

•
41 are classified by the RMAP as not in operation or having temporarily ceased operations, or have been reclassified as a non-smelter; and

•
Two are under review by the RMAP as no longer compliant

A list of smelters and refiners that we believe are contained in our supply chain and are either compliant or active as determined by the RMAP is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

We requested mine or location of origin information, if known, from each of our direct suppliers, most of which do not source directly from processing facilities, for the purposes of determining the source and chain of custody of the necessary 3TG in our supply chain. Based on country of origin information provided by the RMI for RMAP-compliant processing facilities:

•
The necessary 3TG in our products which may have originated from the Covered Countries came from one or more of the following: Burundi, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia; and

•
The necessary 3TG in our products which may have originated outside the Covered Countries came from one or more of the following: Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Benin, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Botswana, Brazil, Brunei, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Croatia, Cuba*, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, The Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana, Honduras, Hong Kong, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran*, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Republic of Korea, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Latvia, Lebanon, Liberia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macau, Madagascar, Malaysia, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Netherlands, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Phillippines, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Qatar, Romania, Russian Federation, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somaliland, South Africa, Spain, Sudan*, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela*, Viet Nam, Yemen, and Zimbabwe

* Minerals from this country were substantially transformed before being incorporated into finished products. Such a substantial transformation of the minerals happened outside of the United States in a third country by a person other than a United States person.

However, we are unable to determine, as of the date of the filing of the Form SD to which this Conflict Minerals Report is an exhibit, the origin of all necessary 3TG that were contained in the products we contracted to manufacture during the Reporting Period.

STEPS TAKEN OR TO BE TAKEN TO MITIGATE RISK AND IMPROVE DUE DILIGENCE

NVIDIA has been a member of the RBA, a coalition of leading electronics companies working together to improve social, ethical, and environmental responsibility in the global supply chain, since 2007. We have also been an active participant in the RMI, a multi-sector partnership focused on addressing conflict minerals issues and challenges. Additionally, to support initiatives targeted at improving the traceability of conflict minerals in the Great Lakes Region of Central Africa, which includes the Democratic Republic of the Congo, we joined the Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade in 2013 and renewed our membership for an additional five years in 2017.

We are also part of the Smelter Engagement Team sub-work group of the RMI, which performs outreach to smelters, encouraging recognized smelters and refiners to participate in the RMAP. Apart from our participation with the Smelter Engagement Team, since 2013 we have also contacted approximately 91 smelters and refiners directly to encourage them to be audited through RMAP, including the one smelter that is undergoing review by the RMAP as no longer compliant.

We have adopted a goal to use only conflict-free 3TG in our products. Accordingly, we implemented a formal conflict minerals policy by which we communicated our expectation to our suppliers that they acquire materials from conflict-free sources within the Covered Countries and to provide their supply chain conflict minerals information to us using the CMRT. We also informed them that we would assess, and potentially withhold, future business with suppliers who do not comply with our




policy. Since 2016, we have removed companies from our supplier base due, in part, to their lack of compliance with our policy.

In 2017, we joined the RMI Sensing and Prioritization Work Group to focus on emerging risks and additional minerals beyond armed conflict and 3TG and outside of the Covered Countries geography.

In 2018, we requested our suppliers to engage with their supply chain, and leveraged our membership and participation in RBA work groups, to encourage approximately 30 smelters or refiners that were neither compliant nor active, according to the RMAP, to be audited by an independent third party. Additionally, we reviewed our approved vendor list, continued to communicate our intention to withhold business with suppliers who do not comply with our Conflict Minerals Policy, and streamlined our supplier base appropriately. Finally, we sought opportunities to join new industry and stakeholder initiatives to support the responsible sourcing of minerals, resulting in our joining of the RMI Due Diligence Practices Team to assess ongoing risks with 3TG and future risks concerning other minerals and global regions.

In 2019, we undertook several activities to mitigate the risk that our necessary 3TG may benefit armed groups and to improve our due diligence measures. We continued to investigate other minerals of concern and other global regions of high risk. In particular, as the RMI program matured, we began to investigate Cobalt in our supply chain and surveyed our strategic suppliers accordingly. We also integrated a conflict minerals risk ranking into new supplier assessments and addressed high risk issues. Additionally, we adjusted our approved vendors list based on suppliers who we deemed to be a high risk for conflict minerals concerns. Finally, we requested that our suppliers remove from our supply chain those smelters which continued to be non-compliant to the RMAP protocol, “not in operation” or “not recognized by the RMI”.

In 2020, we plan to enhance our conflict minerals due diligence program with the following activities:
•
Expanding on our initial investigation of Cobalt by leveraging our third-party supplier management software to survey all suppliers for Cobalt use and smelter data;
•
Continuing to monitor additional legal requirements, including the EU Conflict Minerals Regulations, to determine any future obligations regarding conflict materials and high-risk regions of the world.
•
Increasing our involvement in the RMI’s Smelter Engagement Team sub-work group, including participation on the Global Research Team, which will be researching important foundational work as well as investigating alleged smelters and refiners to determine their eligibility for RMAP; and
•
Continuing to adjust our approved vendor list based on suppliers ranked as a high risk for conflict minerals concerns and removing any high-risk smelters from our supply chain.

INHERENT LIMITATIONS ON DUE DILIGENCE MEASURES
 
Because of our fabless manufacturing strategy and our contract manufacturing process for our branded devices, our due diligence measures can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance regarding the source and chain of custody of the necessary conflict minerals in the products we contract to have manufactured. Given our place in the supply chain, we have no direct relationships with smelters, refiners, and therefore possess no independent means of determining the source and origin of conflict mineral ores processed by smelters or refiners. Our due diligence processes are based on the necessity of seeking data from our suppliers and component manufacturers and those suppliers seeking similar information within their supply chains to identify the original sources of the necessary conflict minerals. We also rely, to a large extent, on information collected and provided by independent third-party audit programs. Such sources of information may yield inaccurate or incomplete information and may be subject to fraud.
 




PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

© 2020 NVIDIA Corporation. All rights reserved. NVIDIA, the NVIDIA logo, GeForce, GTX, Jetson, NVIDIA 3D Vision, NVIDIA AGX, NVIDIA DGX, NVIDIA DRIVE, NVIDIA HGX, NVIDIA RTX, NVIDIA SHIELD, Quadro, SLI, Tegra, and Tesla are trademarks and/or registered trademarks of NVIDIA Corporation in the United States and other countries. Other company and product names may be trademarks of the respective companies with which they are associated.

During the Reporting Period, we identified the following products that may contain necessary conflict minerals that we manufactured or contracted to manufacture:
 
•
Graphic Processing Units, including:
◦
GeForce;
◦
Quadro;
◦
TITAN;
◦
Tesla;
◦
GTX series; and
◦
RTX series
•
DGX and HGX server products
•
Tegra processors and modules
•
NVIDIA SHIELD gaming portables, controllers, and Android TV boxes
•
NVIDIA 3D Vision glasses
•
Jetson developer kit and modules
•
NVIDIA DRIVE PX and DRIVE AGX
•
NVIDIA G-SYNC
•
SLI bridges

The description of our due diligence process above to determine the location of origin of the conflict minerals in NVIDIA’s products is hereby incorporated by reference into this section of our Conflict Minerals Report.




EXHIBIT A

Compliant or Active Smelters and Refiners Reported in NVIDIA’s Supply Chain as of May 5, 2020

Metal
Name of Smelter or Refiner
Smelter or Refiner Location
Gold
8853 S.p.A.
Italy
Gold
Advanced Chemical Company
United States of America
Gold
Aida Chemical Industries Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Al Etihad Gold LLC
United Arab Emirates
Gold
Allgemeine Gold-und Silberscheideanstalt A.G.
Germany
Gold
Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex (AMMC)
Uzbekistan
Gold
AngloGold Ashanti Córrego do Sítio Mineração
Brazil
Gold
Argor-Heraeus S.A.
Switzerland
Gold
Asahi Pretec Corp.
Japan
Gold
Asahi Refining Canada Ltd.
Canada
Gold
Asahi Refining USA Inc.
United States of America
Gold
Asaka Riken Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
AU Traders and Refiners
South Africa
Gold
Aurubis AG
Germany
Gold
Bangalore Refinery
India
Gold
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (Central Bank of the Philippines)
Philippines
Gold
Boliden AB
Sweden
Gold
C. Hafner GmbH + Co. KG
Germany
Gold
CCR Refinery - Glencore Canada Corporation
Canada
Gold
Cendres + Metaux S.A.
Switzerland
Gold
Chimet S.p.A.
Italy
Gold
Chugai Mining
Japan
Gold
Daejin Indus Co., Ltd.
Korea (Republic of)
Gold
Daye Non-Ferrous Metals Mining Ltd.
China
Gold
DODUCO GmbH
Germany
Gold
Dowa
Japan
Gold
DS Pretech Co., Ltd.
Korea (Republic of)
Gold
DSC (Do Sung Corporation)
Korea (Republic of)
Gold
Eco-System Recycling Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Eco-System Recycling Co., Ltd. North Plant
Japan
Gold
Eco-System Recycling Co., Ltd. West Plant
Japan
Gold
Emirates Gold DMCC
United Arab Emirates
Gold
Geib Refining Corporation
United States of America
Gold
Gold Refinery of Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
China
Gold
Great Wall Precious Metals Co., Ltd. of CBPM
China
Gold
HeeSung Metal Ltd.
Korea (Republic of)
Gold
Heimerle + Meule GmbH
Germany
Gold
Heraeus Metals Hong Kong Ltd.
China
Gold
Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH & Co. KG
Germany
Gold
Inner Mongolia Qiankun Gold and Silver Refinery Share Co., Ltd.
China
Gold
Ishifuku Metal Industry Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Istanbul Gold Refinery
Turkey




Gold
Italpreziosi
Italy
Gold
Japan Mint
Japan
Gold
Jiangxi Copper Co., Ltd.
China
Gold
JSC Uralelectromed
Russian Federation
Gold
JX Nippon Mining & Metals Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Kazzinc
Kazakhstan
Gold
Kennecott Utah Copper LLC
United States of America
Gold
KGHM Polska Miedź Spółka Akcyjna
Poland
Gold
Kojima Chemicals Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Korea Zinc Co., Ltd.
Korea (Republic of)
Gold
Kyrgyzaltyn JSC
Kyrgyzstan
Gold
L’Orfebre S.A.
Andorra
Gold
LS-NIKKO Copper Inc.
Korea (Republic of)
Gold
Marsam Metals
Brazil
Gold
Materion
United States of America
Gold
Matsuda Sangyo Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Metalor Technologies (Hong Kong) Ltd.
China
Gold
Metalor Technologies (Singapore) Pte., Ltd.
Singapore
Gold
Metalor Technologies (Suzhou) Ltd.
China
Gold
Metalor Technologies S.A.
Switzerland
Gold
Metalor USA Refining Corporation
United States of America
Gold
Metalúrgica Met-Mex Peñoles S.A. De C.V.
Mexico
Gold
Mitsubishi Materials Corporation
Japan
Gold
Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
MMTC-PAMP India Pvt., Ltd.
India
Gold
Moscow Special Alloys Processing Plant
Russian Federation
Gold
Nadir Metal Rafineri San. Ve Tic. A.Ş.
Turkey
Gold
Navoi Mining and Metallurgical Combinat
Uzbekistan
Gold
Nihon Material Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Ögussa Österreichische Gold- und Silber-Scheideanstalt GmbH
Austria
Gold
Ohura Precious Metal Industry Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
OJSC "The Gulidov Krasnoyarsk Non-Ferrous Metals Plant" (OJSC Krastsvetmet)
Russian Federation
Gold
OJSC Novosibirsk Refinery
Russian Federation
Gold
PAMP S.A.
Switzerland
Gold
Planta Recuperadora de Metals SpA
Chile
Gold
Prioksky Plant of Non-Ferrous Metals
Russian Federation
Gold
PT Aneka Tambang (Persero) Tbk
Indonesia
Gold
PX Précinox S.A.
Switzerland
Gold
Rand Refinery (Pty) Ltd.
South Africa
Gold
Remondis Argentina B.V.
Netherlands
Gold
Republic Metals Corporation
United States of America
Gold
Royal Canadian Mint
Canada
Gold
SAAMP
France
Gold
Safimet S.p.A.
Italy
Gold
SAFINA A.S.
Czechia
Gold
Samduck Precious Metals
Korea (Republic of)




Gold
SAXONIA Edelmetalle GmbH
Germany
Gold
SEMPSA Joyería Platería S.A.
Spain
Gold
Shandong Zhaojin Gold & Silver Refinery Co., Ltd.
China
Gold
Sichuan Tianze Precious Metals Co., Ltd.
China
Gold
Singway Technology Co., Ltd.
Taiwan, Province of China
Gold
SOE Shyolkovsky Factory of Secondary Precious Metals
Russian Federation
Gold
Solar Applied Materials Technology Corp.
Taiwan, Province of China
Gold
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
SungEel HiMetal Co., Ltd.
Korea (Republic of)
Gold
T.C.A S.p.A
Italy
Gold
Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo K.K.
Japan
Gold
The Refinery of Shandong Gold Mining Co., Ltd.
China
Gold
Tokuriki Honten Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
TOO Tau-Ken-Altyn
Kazakhstan
Gold
Torecom
Korea (Republic of)
Gold
Umicore Brasil Ltda.
Brazil
Gold
Umicore Precious Metals Thailand
Thailand
Gold
Umicore S.A. Business Unit Precious Metals Refining
Belgium
Gold
United Precious Metal Refining, Inc.
United States of America
Gold
Valcambi S.A.
Switzerland
Gold
Western Australian Mint trading as The Perth Mint
Australia
Gold
WIELAND Edelmetalle GmbH
Germany
Gold
Yamakin Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Yokohama Metal Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Zhongyuan Gold Smelter of Zhongjin Gold Corporation
China
Tantalum
Asaka Riken Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
Changsha South Tantalum Niobium Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
CP Metals Inc.
United States of America
Tantalum
D Block Metals, LLC
United States of America
Tantalum
Exotech Inc.
United States of America
Tantalum
F&X Electro-Materials Ltd.
China
Tantalum
FIR Metals & Resource Ltd.
China
Tantalum
Global Advanced Metals Aizu
Japan
Tantalum
Global Advanced Metals Boyertown
United States of America
Tantalum
Guangdong Rising Rare Metals-EO Materials Ltd.
China
Tantalum
Guangdong Zhiyuan New Material Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
H.C. Starck Co., Ltd.
Thailand
Tantalum
H.C. Starck Hermsdorf GmbH
Germany
Tantalum
H.C. Starck Inc.
United States of America
Tantalum
H.C. Starck Ltd.
Japan
Tantalum
H.C. Starck Smelting GmbH & Co. KG
Germany
Tantalum
H.C. Starck Tantalum and Niobium GmbH
Germany
Tantalum
Hengyang King Xing Lifeng New Materials Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
Jiangxi Dinghai Tantalum & Niobium Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
Jiangxi Tuohong New Raw Material
China
Tantalum
Jiujiang Janny New Material Co., Ltd.
China




Tantalum
JiuJiang JinXin Nonferrous Metals Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
Jiujiang Tanbre Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
Jiujiang Zhongao Tantalum & Niobium Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
KEMET Blue Metals
Mexico
Tantalum
KEMET Blue Powder
United States of America
Tantalum
LSM Brasil S.A.
Brazil
Tantalum
Metallurgical Products India Pvt., Ltd.
India
Tantalum
Mineração Taboca S.A.
Brazil
Tantalum
Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co., Ltd.
Japan
Tantalum
Ningxia Orient Tantalum Industry Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
NPM Silmet AS
China
Tantalum
Power Resources Ltd.
Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of
Tantalum
QuantumClean
United States of America
Tantalum
Resind Indústria e Comércio Ltda.
Brazil
Tantalum
Solikamsk Magnesium Works OAO
Russian Federation
Tantalum
Taki Chemical Co., Ltd.
Japan
Tantalum
Telex Metals
United States of America
Tantalum
Ulba Metallurgical Plant JSC
Kazakhstan
Tantalum
XinXing HaoRong Electronic Material Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
Yanling Jincheng Tantalum & Niobium Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Alpha
United States of America
Tin
Chenzhou Yunxiang Mining and Metallurgy Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Chifeng Dajingzi Tin Industry Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
China Tin Group Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
CV Ayi Jaya
Indonesia
Tin
CV Dua Sekawan
Indonesia
Tin
CV Gita Pesona
Indonesia
Tin
CV United Smelting
Indonesia
Tin
CV Venus Inti Perkasa
Indonesia
Tin
Dongguan CiEXPO Environmental Engineering Co., Ltd.
Indonesia
Tin
Dowa
Japan
Tin
EM Vinto
Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Tin
Fenix Metals
Poland
Tin
Gejiu Fengming Metallurgy Chemical Plant
China
Tin
Gejiu Jinye Mineral Company
China
Tin
Gejiu Kai Meng Industry and Trade LLC
China
Tin
Gejiu Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Gejiu Yunxin Nonferrous Electrolysis Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Gejiu Zili Mining And Metallurgy Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Guangdong Hanhe Non-Ferrous Metal Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Guanyang Guida Nonferrous Metal Smelting Plant
China
Tin
HuiChang Hill Tin Industry Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
HuiChang Jinshunda Tin Industry Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Jiangxi Ketai Advanced Material Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Jiangxi New Nanshan Technology Ltd.
China




Tin
Ma'anshan Weitai Tin Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Magnu's Minerais Metais e Ligas Ltda.
Brazil
Tin
Malaysia Smelting Corporation (MSC)
Malaysia
Tin
Melt Metais e Ligas S.A.
Brazil
Tin
Metallic Resources, Inc.
United States of America
Tin
Metallo Belgium N.V.
Belgium
Tin
Metallo Spain S.L.U.
Spain
Tin
Mineração Taboca S.A.
Brazil
Tin
Minsur
Peru
Tin
Mitsubishi Materials Corporation
Japan
Tin
Modeltech Sdn Bhd
Malaysia
Tin
O.M. Manufacturing (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
Thailand
Tin
O.M. Manufacturing Philippines, Inc.
Philippines
Tin
Operaciones Metalurgical S.A.
Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Tin
Precious Minerals and Smelting Limited
India
Tin
PT Aries Kencana Sejahtera
Indonesia
Tin
PT Artha Cipta Langgeng
Indonesia
Tin
PT ATD Makmur Mandiri Jaya
Indonesia
Tin
PT Babel Inti Perkasa
Indonesia
Tin
PT Bangka Prima Tin
Indonesia
Tin
PT Bangka Serumpun
Indonesia
Tin
PT Babel Surya Alam Lestari
Indonesia
Tin
PT Bangka Tin Industry
Indonesia
Tin
PT Belitung Industri Sejahtera
Indonesia
Tin
PT Bukit Timah
Indonesia
Tin
PT DS Jaya Abadi
Indonesia
Tin
PT Eunindo Usaha Mandiri
Indonesia
Tin
PT Inti Stania Prima
Indonesia
Tin
PT Karimun Mining
Indonesia
Tin
PT Kijang Jaya Mandiri
Indonesia
Tin
PT Lautan Harmonis Sejahtera
Indonesia
Tin
PT Menara Cipta Mulia
Indonesia
Tin
PT Mitra Stania Prima
Indonesia
Tin
PT Panca Mega Persada
Indonesia
Tin
PT Premium Tin Indonesia
Indonesia
Tin
PT Prima Timah Utama
Indonesia
Tin
PT Rajawali Rimba Perkasa
Indonesia
Tin
PT Rajehan Ariq
Indonesia
Tin
PT Refined Bangka Tin
Indonesia
Tin
PT Sariwiguna Binasentosa
Indonesia
Tin
PT Stanindo Inti Perkasa
Indonesia
Tin
PT Sukses Inti Makmur
Indonesia
Tin
PT Sumber Jaya Indah
Indonesia
Tin
PT Timah (Persero) Tbk Kundur
Indonesia
Tin
PT Timah (Persero) Tbk Mentok
Indonesia
Tin
PT Tinindo Inter Nusa
Indonesia




Tin
PT Tirus Putra Mandiri
Indonesia
Tin
PT Tommy Utama
Indonesia
Tin
Resind Indústria e Comércio Ltda.
Brazil
Tin
Rui Da Hung
Taiwan, Province of China
Tin
Soft Metais Ltda.
Brazil
Tin
Thai Nguyen Mining and Metallurgy Co., Ltd.
Viet Nam
Tin
Thaisarco
Thailand
Tin
Tin Technology & Refining
United States of America
Tin
White Solder Metalurgia e Mineração Ltda.
Brazil
Tin
Yunnan Chengfeng Non-ferrous Metals Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Yunnan Tin Company Limited
China
Tin
Yunnan Yunfan Non-ferrous Metals Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
A.L.M.T. TUNGSTEN Corp.
Japan
Tungsten
ACL Metais Eireli
Brazil
Tungsten
Asia Tungsten Products Vietnam Ltd.
Viet Nam
Tungsten
Chenzhou Diamond Tungsten Products Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Chongyi Zhangyuan Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Fujian Ganmin RareMetal Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Fujian Jinxin Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Ganzhou Haichuang Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Ganzhou Huaxing Tungsten Products Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Ganzhou Jiangwu Ferrotungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Ganzhou Seadragon W & Mo Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Global Tungsten & Powders Corp.
United States of America
Tungsten
Guangdong Xianglu Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
H.C. Starck Smelting GmbH & Co. KG
Germany
Tungsten
H.C. Starck Tungsten GmbH
Germany
Tungsten
Hunan Chenzhou Mining Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Hunan Chuangda Vanadium Tungsten Co., Ltd. Wuji
China
Tungsten
Hunan Chunchang Nonferrous Metals Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Hunan Litian Tungsten Industry Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Hydrometallurg, JSC
Russian Federation
Tungsten
Japan New Metals Co., Ltd.
Japan
Tungsten
Jiangwu H.C. Starck Tungsten Products Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Jiangxi Gan Bei Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Jiangxi Tonggu Non-ferrous Metallurgical & Chemical Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Jiangxi Dayu Longxintai Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Jiangxi Xinsheng Tungsten Industry Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Jiangxi Yaosheng Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
JSC "Kirovgrad Hard Alloys Plant"
Russian Federation
Tungsten
Kennametal Fallon
United States of America
Tungsten
Kennametal Huntsville
United States of America
Tungsten
KGETS Co., Ltd.
Korea, Republic of
Tungsten
Lianyou Metals Co., Ltd.
Taiwan, Province of
Tungsten
Malipo Haiyu Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Masan Tungsten Chemical LLC (MTC)
Viet Nam




Tungsten
Moliren Ltd
Russian Federation
Tungsten
Niagara Refining LLC
United States of America
Tungsten
Philippine Chuangxin Industrial Co., Inc.
Philippines
Tungsten
South-East Nonferrous Metal Company Limited of Hengyang City
China
Tungsten
Tejing (Vietnam) Tungsten Co., Ltd.
Viet Nam
Tungsten
Unecha Refractory metals plant
Russian Federation
Tungsten
Vietnam Youngsun Tungsten Industry Co., Ltd.
Viet Nam
Tungsten
Wolfram Bergbau und Hütten AG
Austria
Tungsten
Woltech Korea Co., Ltd.
Korea (Republic of)
Tungsten
Xiamen Tungsten (H.C.) Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Xinfeng Huarui Tungsten & Molybdenum New Material Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Xinhai Rendan Shaoguan Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China