| Derivatives and Hedging Activities |
Derivatives and Hedging Activities Derivatives are instruments that derive their value from underlying asset prices, indices, reference rates and other inputs, or a combination of these factors. Derivatives may be traded on an exchange (exchange-traded) or they may be privately negotiated contracts, which are usually referred to as OTC derivatives. Certain of the firm’s OTC derivatives are cleared and settled through central clearing counterparties (OTC-cleared), while others are bilateral contracts between two counterparties (bilateral OTC). As a market maker, the firm enters into derivative transactions to provide liquidity to clients and to facilitate the transfer and hedging of their risks. In this role, the firm typically acts as principal and is required to commit capital to provide execution, and maintains market-making positions in response to, or in anticipation of, client demand. The firm also enters into derivatives to actively manage risk exposures that arise from its market-making and investing and financing activities. The firm’s holdings and exposures are hedged, in many cases, on either a portfolio or risk-specific basis, as opposed to an basis. The offsetting impact of this economic hedging is reflected in the same business segment as the related revenues. In addition, the firm may enter into derivatives designated as hedges under U.S. GAAP. These derivatives are used to manage interest rate exposure of certain fixed-rate unsecured borrowings and deposits, as well as to manage foreign exchange risk of certain securities and the net investment in certain non-U.S. operations. The firm enters into various types of derivatives, including:
| • |
|
Contracts that commit counterparties to purchase or sell financial instruments, commodities or currencies in the future. |
| • |
|
Contracts that require counterparties to exchange cash flows, such as currency or interest payment streams. The amounts exchanged are based on the specific terms of the contract with reference to specified rates, financial instruments, commodities, currencies or indices. |
| • |
|
Contracts in which the option purchaser has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase from or sell to the option writer financial instruments, commodities or currencies within a defined time period for a specified price. | Derivatives are reported on a basis (i.e., the net payable or receivable for derivative assets and liabilities for a given counterparty) when a legal right of setoff exists under an enforceable netting agreement (counterparty netting). Derivatives are accounted for at fair value, net of cash collateral received or posted under enforceable credit support agreements (cash collateral netting). Derivative assets are included in trading assets and derivative liabilities are included in trading liabilities. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on derivatives not designated as hedges are included in market making (for derivatives included in the Global Markets segment), and other principal transactions (for derivatives included in the remaining business segments) in the consolidated statements of earnings. For both the years ended December 2020 and December 2019, substantially all of the firm’s derivatives were included in the Global Markets segment. The tables below present the gross fair value and the notional amounts of derivative contracts by major product type, the amounts of counterparty and cash collateral netting in the consolidated balance sheets, as well as cash and securities collateral posted and received under enforceable credit support agreements that do not meet the criteria for netting under U.S. GAAP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 2019 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets |
|
|
|
Derivative Liabilities |
|
Not accounted for as hedges |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 476 |
|
|
|
$ 856 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,958 |
|
|
|
8,618 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,387 |
|
|
|
242,046 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276,821 |
|
|
|
251,520 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,551 |
|
|
|
6,929 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,178 |
|
|
|
13,860 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,729 |
|
|
|
20,789 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,887 |
|
|
|
81,613 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,333 |
|
|
|
82,014 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,390 |
|
|
|
2,272 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,568 |
|
|
|
13,034 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,138 |
|
|
|
15,549 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,499 |
|
|
|
16,976 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,162 |
|
|
|
39,531 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,661 |
|
|
|
56,507 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438,682 |
|
|
|
426,379 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,182 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,182 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,214 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 441,896 |
|
|
|
$ 426,590 |
|
| Offset in the consolidated balance sheets |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (14,159 |
) |
|
|
$ (14,159 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,565 |
) |
|
|
(15,565 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(310,920 |
) |
|
|
(310,920 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(340,644 |
) |
|
|
(340,644 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,302 |
) |
|
|
(526 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,698 |
) |
|
|
(41,618 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,000 |
) |
|
|
(42,144 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$(396,644 |
) |
|
|
$(382,788 |
) |
Included in the consolidated balance sheets |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 2,241 |
|
|
|
$ 5,955 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,762 |
|
|
|
37,700 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 45,252 |
|
|
|
$ 43,802 |
|
| Not offset in the consolidated balance sheets |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (604 |
) |
|
|
$ (1,603 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,196 |
) |
|
|
(9,252 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 30,452 |
|
|
|
$ 32,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Notional Amounts as of December |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
Not accounted for as hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 4,757,300 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,440,376 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,668,171 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,865,847 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,342 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
707,935 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,104,277 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,566 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,060 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,926,602 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,065,228 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,018 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,639 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,228 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
475,885 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
910,099 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,182,335 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,092,434 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,603,671 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,531 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,714 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,245 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,152 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,247 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,399 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,644 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$39,750,315 |
|
| • |
|
Gross fair values exclude the effects of both counterparty netting and collateral, and therefore are not representative of the firm’s exposure. |
| • |
|
Where the firm has received or posted collateral under credit support agreements, but has not yet determined such agreements are enforceable, the related collateral has not been netted. |
| • |
|
Notional amounts, which represent the sum of gross long and short derivative contracts, provide an indication of the volume of the firm’s derivative activity and do not represent anticipated losses. |
| • |
|
Total gross fair value of derivatives included derivative assets of $20.60 billion as of December 2020 and $9.15 billion as of December 2019, and derivative liabilities of $22.98 billion as of December 2020 and $14.88 billion as of December 2019, which are not subject to an enforceable netting agreement or are subject to a netting agreement that the firm has not yet determined to be enforceable. |
| • |
|
During the first quarter of 2020, consistent with the rules of a clearing organization, the firm elected to consider its transactions with that clearing organization as settled each day. The impact of this change would have been a reduction in gross credit derivative assets of $3.97 billion and liabilities of $4.15 billion as of December 2019, and a corresponding decrease in counterparty and cash collateral netting, with no impact to the consolidated balance sheets. | Fair Value of Derivatives by Level The table below presents derivatives on a gross basis by level and product type, as well as the impact of netting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty netting in levels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-level counterparty netting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty netting in levels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-level counterparty netting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
$3 |
|
|
|
$279,443 |
|
|
|
$ 557 |
|
|
|
$ 280,003 |
|
| |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
17,204 |
|
|
|
3,525 |
|
|
|
20,729 |
|
| |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
80,178 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
80,365 |
|
| |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
10,648 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
11,138 |
|
| |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
48,953 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
49,661 |
|
| |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
436,426 |
|
|
|
5,446 |
|
|
|
441,896 |
|
Counterparty netting in levels |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(340,325 |
) |
|
|
(792 |
) |
|
|
(341,117 |
) |
| |
|
|
$24 |
|
|
|
$ 96,101 |
|
|
|
$ 4,654 |
|
|
|
$ 100,779 |
|
Cross-level counterparty netting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
473 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,000 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 45,252 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
$ (3 |
) |
|
|
$ (251,050 |
) |
|
|
$ (468 |
) |
|
|
$ (251,521 |
) |
| |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(19,141 |
) |
|
|
(1,648 |
) |
|
|
(20,789 |
) |
| |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(81,826 |
) |
|
|
(398 |
) |
|
|
(82,224 |
) |
| |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(15,306 |
) |
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
(15,549 |
) |
| |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(53,817 |
) |
|
|
(2,664 |
) |
|
|
(56,507 |
) |
| |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(421,140 |
) |
|
|
(5,421 |
) |
|
|
(426,590 |
) |
Counterparty netting in levels |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
340,325 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
341,117 |
|
| |
|
|
$ (29 |
) |
|
|
$ (80,815 |
) |
|
|
$ (4,629 |
) |
|
|
$ (85,473 |
) |
Cross-level counterparty netting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(473 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,144 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (43,802 |
) |
| • |
|
Gross fair values exclude the effects of both counterparty netting and collateral netting, and therefore are not representative of the firm’s exposure. |
| • |
|
Counterparty netting is reflected in each level to the extent that receivable and payable balances are netted within the same level and is included in counterparty netting in levels. Where the counterparty netting is across levels, the netting is included in cross-level counterparty netting. |
| • |
|
Derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts. | See Note 4 for an overview of the firm’s fair value measurement policies and the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to determine the fair value of derivatives. Significant Unobservable Inputs The table below presents the amount of level 3 derivative assets (liabilities), and ranges, averages and medians of significant unobservable inputs used to value level 3 derivatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 2019 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
$ in millions, except inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount or |
|
|
|
Average/ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$89 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42)% to 81% |
|
|
|
52%/60% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 to 150 |
|
|
|
70/61 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 to 559 |
|
|
|
96/53 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 to 90 |
|
|
|
38/32 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% to 60% |
|
|
|
31%/25% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$(211) |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20% to 70% |
|
|
|
37%/36% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$247 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9% to 57% |
|
|
|
26%/25% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$(1,977) |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70)% to 99% |
|
|
|
42%/45% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2% to 72% |
|
|
|
14%/7% |
|
| • |
|
Derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts. |
| • |
|
Ranges represent the significant unobservable inputs that were used in the valuation of each type of derivative. |
| • |
|
Averages represent the arithmetic average of the inputs and are not weighted by the relative fair value or notional of the respective financial instruments. An average greater than the median indicates that the majority of inputs are below the average. For example, the difference between the average and the median for credit spreads indicates that the majority of the inputs fall in the lower end of the range. |
| • |
|
The ranges, averages and medians of these inputs are not representative of the appropriate inputs to use when calculating the fair value of any one derivative. For example, the highest correlation for interest rate derivatives is appropriate for valuing a specific interest rate derivative but may not be appropriate for valuing any other interest rate derivative. Accordingly, the ranges of inputs do not represent uncertainty in, or possible ranges of, fair value measurements of level 3 derivatives. |
| • |
|
Interest rates, currencies and equities derivatives are valued using option pricing models, credit derivatives are valued using option pricing, correlation and discounted cash flow models, and commodities derivatives are valued using option pricing and discounted cash flow models. |
| • |
|
The fair value of any one instrument may be determined using multiple valuation techniques. For example, option pricing models and discounted cash flows models are typically used together to determine fair value. Therefore, the level 3 balance encompasses both of these techniques. |
| • |
|
Correlation within currencies and equities includes cross-product type correlation. |
| • |
|
Volatility was not significant to the valuation of level 3 currency derivatives as of December 2019. |
| • |
|
Natural gas spread represents the spread per million British thermal units of natural gas. |
| • |
|
Oil spread represents the spread per barrel of oil and refined products. | Range of Significant Unobservable Inputs The following provides information about the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm’s level 3 derivative instruments:
| • |
|
Ranges for correlation cover a variety of underliers both within one product type (e.g., equity index and equity single stock names) and across product types (e.g., correlation of an interest rate and a currency), as well as across regions. Generally, cross-product type correlation inputs are used to value more complex instruments and are lower than correlation inputs on assets within the same derivative product type. |
| • |
|
Ranges for volatility cover numerous underliers across a variety of markets, maturities and strike prices. For example, volatility of equity indices is generally lower than volatility of single stocks. |
| • |
|
Credit spreads, upfront credit points and recovery rates. The ranges for credit spreads, upfront credit points and recovery rates cover a variety of underliers (index and single names), regions, sectors, maturities and credit qualities (high-yield and investment-grade). The broad range of this population gives rise to the width of the ranges of significant unobservable inputs. |
| • |
|
Commodity prices and spreads. The ranges for commodity prices and spreads cover variability in products, maturities and delivery locations. | Sensitivity of Fair Value Measurement to Changes in Significant Unobservable Inputs The following is a description of the directional sensitivity of the firm’s level 3 fair value measurements to changes in significant unobservable inputs, in isolation, as of each period-end:
| • |
|
In general, for contracts where the holder benefits from the convergence of the underlying asset or index prices (e.g., interest rates, credit spreads, foreign exchange rates, inflation rates and equity prices), an increase in correlation results in a higher fair value measurement. |
| • |
|
In general, for purchased options, an increase in volatility results in a higher fair value measurement. |
| • |
|
Credit spreads, upfront credit points and recovery rates. In general, the fair value of purchased credit protection increases as credit spreads or upfront credit points increase or recovery rates decrease. Credit spreads, upfront credit points and recovery rates are strongly related to distinctive risk factors of the underlying reference obligations, which include reference entity-specific factors, such as leverage, volatility and industry, market-based risk factors, such as borrowing costs or liquidity of the underlying reference obligation, and macroeconomic conditions. |
| • |
|
Commodity prices and spreads. In general, for contracts where the holder is receiving a commodity, an increase in the spread (price difference from a benchmark index due to differences in quality or delivery location) or price results in a higher fair value measurement. | Due to the distinctive nature of each of the firm’s level 3 derivatives, the interrelationship of inputs is not necessarily uniform within each product type. The table below presents a summary of the changes in fair value for level 3 derivatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
Total level 3 derivatives, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 590 |
|
Net realized gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
Net unrealized gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(454 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
444 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(668 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(248 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 25 |
|
| • |
|
Changes in fair value are presented for all derivative assets and liabilities that are classified in level 3 as of the end of the period. |
| • |
|
Net unrealized gains/(losses) relates to instruments that were still held at period-end. |
| • |
|
Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are reported at the beginning of the reporting period in which they occur. If a derivative was transferred into level 3 during a reporting period, its entire gain or loss for the period is classified in level 3. |
| • |
|
Positive amounts for transfers into level 3 and negative amounts for transfers out of level 3 represent net transfers of derivative assets. Negative amounts for transfers into level 3 and positive amounts for transfers out of level 3 represent net transfers of derivative liabilities. |
| • |
|
A derivative with level 1 and/or level 2 inputs is classified in level 3 in its entirety if it has at least one significant level 3 input. |
| • |
|
If there is one significant level 3 input, the entire gain or loss from adjusting only observable inputs (i.e., level 1 and level 2 inputs) is classified in level 3. |
| • |
|
Gains or losses that have been classified in level 3 resulting from changes in level 1 or level 2 inputs are frequently offset by gains or losses attributable to level 1 or level 2 derivatives and/or level 1, level 2 and level 3 trading cash instruments. As a result, gains/(losses) included in the level 3 rollforward below do not necessarily represent the overall impact on the firm’s results of operations, liquidity or capital resources. | The table below presents information, by product type, for derivatives included in the summary table above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (109 |
) |
Net realized gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Net unrealized gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
– |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 89 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 1,672 |
|
Net realized gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
Net unrealized gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
273 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 1,877 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 461 |
|
Net realized gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
Net unrealized gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(327 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (211 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 112 |
|
Net realized gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
Net unrealized gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
219 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 247 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$(1,546 |
) |
Net realized gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
166 |
|
Net unrealized gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(818 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(459 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
759 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$(1,977 |
) | Level 3 Rollforward Commentary Year Ended December 2020. The net realized and unrealized gains on level 3 derivatives of $838 million (reflecting $226 million of net realized gains and $612 million of net unrealized gains) for 2020 included gains of $900 million reported in market making and losses of $62 million reported in other principal transactions. The net unrealized gains on level 3 derivatives for 2020 were primarily attributable to gains on certain equity derivatives (primarily reflecting the impact of an increase in equity prices), gains on certain interest rate derivatives (primarily reflecting the impact of a decrease in interest rates and changes in foreign exchange rates), gains on certain commodity derivatives (primarily reflecting the impact of changes in commodity prices), and gains on certain credit derivatives (primarily reflecting the impact of a decrease in interest rates), partially offset by losses on certain currency derivatives (primarily reflecting the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates and a decrease in interest rates). The drivers of both transfers into level 3 derivatives and transfers out of level 3 derivatives during 2020 were not material. Year Ended December 2019. The net realized and unrealized losses on level 3 derivatives of $336 million (reflecting $118 million of net realized gains and $454 million of net unrealized losses) for 2019 included losses of $305 million reported in market making and $31 million reported in other principal transactions. The net unrealized losses on level 3 derivatives for 2019 were primarily attributable to losses on certain equity derivatives (primarily reflecting the impact of an increase in equity prices), and losses on certain currency derivatives (primarily reflecting the impact of a decrease in interest rates and changes in foreign exchange rates), partially offset by gains on certain credit derivatives (primarily reflecting the impact of a decrease in interest rates), gains on certain commodity derivatives (primarily reflecting the impact of changes in commodity prices), and gains on certain interest rate derivatives (primarily reflecting the impact of a decrease in interest rates). The drivers of transfers into level 3 derivatives during 2019 were not material. Transfers out of level 3 derivatives during 2019 primarily reflected transfers of certain equity derivative assets to level 2, principally due to certain unobservable inputs no longer being significant to the valuation of these derivatives. The table below presents OTC derivative assets and liabilities by tenor and major product type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 Year |
|
|
|
1 - 5 Years |
|
|
|
Greater than 5 Years |
|
|
|
Total |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty netting in tenors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-tenor counterparty netting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total OTC derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty netting in tenors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-tenor counterparty netting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total OTC derivative liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
$ 5,521 |
|
|
|
$15,183 |
|
|
|
$57,394 |
|
|
|
$ 78,098 |
|
| |
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
3,259 |
|
|
|
3,183 |
|
|
|
7,120 |
|
| |
|
|
10,236 |
|
|
|
5,063 |
|
|
|
6,245 |
|
|
|
21,544 |
|
| |
|
|
2,507 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
4,021 |
|
| |
|
|
7,332 |
|
|
|
4,509 |
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
13,135 |
|
Counterparty netting in tenors |
|
|
(3,263 |
) |
|
|
(3,673 |
) |
|
|
(2,332 |
) |
|
|
(9,268 |
) |
| |
|
|
$23,011 |
|
|
|
$25,553 |
|
|
|
$66,086 |
|
|
|
$114,650 |
|
Cross-tenor counterparty netting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,639 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,000 |
) |
Total OTC derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 43,011 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
$ 3,654 |
|
|
|
$ 9,113 |
|
|
|
$36,470 |
|
|
|
$ 49,237 |
|
| |
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
|
4,052 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
|
7,180 |
|
| |
|
|
12,486 |
|
|
|
6,906 |
|
|
|
4,036 |
|
|
|
23,428 |
|
| |
|
|
2,796 |
|
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
3,804 |
|
|
|
8,550 |
|
| |
|
|
5,755 |
|
|
|
7,381 |
|
|
|
3,367 |
|
|
|
16,503 |
|
Counterparty netting in tenors |
|
|
(3,263 |
) |
|
|
(3,673 |
) |
|
|
(2,332 |
) |
|
|
(9,268 |
) |
| |
|
|
$22,796 |
|
|
|
$25,729 |
|
|
|
$47,105 |
|
|
|
$ 95,630 |
|
Cross-tenor counterparty netting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,639 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,144 |
) |
Total OTC derivative liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 37,847 |
|
| • |
|
Tenor is based on remaining contractual maturity. |
| • |
|
Counterparty netting within the same product type and tenor category is included within such product type and tenor category. |
| • |
|
Counterparty netting across product types within the same tenor category is included in counterparty netting in tenors. Where the counterparty netting is across tenor categories, the netting is included in cross-tenor counterparty netting. | The firm enters into a broad array of credit derivatives to facilitate client transactions and to manage the credit risk associated with market-making and investing and financing activities. Credit derivatives are actively managed based on the firm’s net risk position. Credit derivatives are generally individually negotiated contracts and can have various settlement and payment conventions. Credit events include failure to pay, bankruptcy, acceleration of indebtedness, restructuring, repudiation and dissolution of the reference entity. The firm enters into the following types of credit derivatives:
| • |
|
Single-name credit default swaps protect the buyer against the loss of principal on one or more bonds, loans or mortgages (reference obligations) in the event the issuer of the reference obligations suffers a credit event. The buyer of protection pays an initial or periodic premium to the seller and receives protection for the period of the contract. If there is no credit event, as defined in the contract, the seller of protection makes no payments to the buyer. If a credit event occurs, the seller of protection is required to make a payment to the buyer, calculated according to the terms of the contract. |
| • |
|
In a credit option, the option writer assumes the obligation to purchase or sell a reference obligation at a specified price or credit spread. The option purchaser buys the right, but does not assume the obligation, to sell the reference obligation to, or purchase it from, the option writer. The payments on credit options depend either on a particular credit spread or the price of the reference obligation. |
| • |
|
Credit Indices, Baskets and Tranches. Credit derivatives may reference a basket of single-name credit default swaps or a broad-based index. If a credit event occurs in one of the underlying reference obligations, the protection seller pays the protection buyer. The payment is typically a pro-rata portion of the transaction’s total notional amount based on the underlying defaulted reference obligation. In certain transactions, the credit risk of a basket or index is separated into various portions (tranches), each having different levels of subordination. The most junior tranches cover initial defaults and once losses exceed the notional amount of these junior tranches, any excess loss is covered by the next most senior tranche. |
| • |
|
A total return swap transfers the risks relating to economic performance of a reference obligation from the protection buyer to the protection seller. Typically, the protection buyer receives a floating rate of interest and protection against any reduction in fair value of the reference obligation, and the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference obligation, plus any increase in the fair value of the reference obligation. | The firm economically hedges its exposure to written credit derivatives primarily by entering into offsetting purchased credit derivatives with identical underliers. Substantially all of the firm’s purchased credit derivative transactions are with financial institutions and are subject to stringent collateral thresholds. In addition, upon the occurrence of a specified trigger event, the firm may take possession of the reference obligations underlying a particular written credit derivative, and consequently may, upon liquidation of the reference obligations, recover amounts on the underlying reference obligations in the event of default. As of December 2020, written credit derivatives had a total gross notional amount of $515.85 billion and purchased credit derivatives had a total gross notional amount of $558.18 billion, for total net notional purchased protection of $42.33 billion. As of December 2019, written credit derivatives had a total gross notional amount of $522.57 billion and purchased credit derivatives had a total gross notional amount of $581.76 billion, for total net notional purchased protection of $59.19 billion. The firm’s written and purchased credit derivatives primarily consist of credit default swaps. The table below presents information about credit derivatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Credit Spread on Underlier (basis points) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 - 250 |
|
|
|
251 - 500 |
|
|
|
501 - 1,000 |
|
|
|
Greater than 1,000 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Payout/Notional Amount of Written Credit Derivatives by Tenor |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Payout/Notional Amount of Purchased Credit Derivatives |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Written Credit Derivatives |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Payout/Notional Amount of Written Credit Derivatives by Tenor |
|
| |
|
|
$143,566 |
|
|
|
$ 7,155 |
|
|
|
$ 759 |
|
|
|
$ 2,953 |
|
|
|
$154,433 |
|
| |
|
|
292,444 |
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
|
|
5,482 |
|
|
|
8,735 |
|
|
|
316,786 |
|
| |
|
|
48,109 |
|
|
|
2,260 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
51,350 |
|
| |
|
|
$484,119 |
|
|
|
$19,540 |
|
|
|
$6,668 |
|
|
|
$12,242 |
|
|
|
$522,569 |
|
Maximum Payout/Notional Amount of Purchased Credit Derivatives |
|
| |
|
|
$395,127 |
|
|
|
$14,492 |
|
|
|
$5,938 |
|
|
|
$10,543 |
|
|
|
$426,100 |
|
| |
|
|
$149,092 |
|
|
|
$ 2,617 |
|
|
|
$1,599 |
|
|
|
$ 2,354 |
|
|
|
$155,662 |
|
Fair Value of Written Credit Derivatives |
|
| |
|
|
$ 13,103 |
|
|
|
$ 446 |
|
|
|
$ 160 |
|
|
|
$ 202 |
|
|
|
$ 13,911 |
|
| |
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
3,490 |
|
|
|
5,549 |
|
| |
|
|
$ 11,864 |
|
|
|
$ (2 |
) |
|
|
$ (212 |
) |
|
|
$ (3,288 |
) |
|
|
$ 8,362 |
|
| • |
|
Fair values exclude the effects of both netting of receivable balances with payable balances under enforceable netting agreements, and netting of cash received or posted under enforceable credit support agreements, and therefore are not representative of the firm’s credit exposure. |
| • |
|
Tenor is based on remaining contractual maturity. |
| • |
|
The credit spread on the underlier, together with the tenor of the contract, are indicators of payment/performance risk. The firm is less likely to pay or otherwise be required to perform where the credit spread and the tenor are lower. |
| • |
|
Offsetting purchased credit derivatives represent the notional amount of purchased credit derivatives that economically hedge written credit derivatives with identical underliers. |
| • |
|
Other purchased credit derivatives represent the notional amount of all other purchased credit derivatives not included in offsetting. | Impact of Credit and Funding Spreads on Derivatives The firm realizes gains or losses on its derivative contracts. These gains or losses include credit valuation adjustments (CVA) relating to uncollateralized derivative assets and liabilities, which represents the gains or losses (including hedges) attributable to the impact of changes in credit exposure, counterparty credit spreads, liability funding spreads (which includes the firm’s own credit), probability of default and assumed recovery. These gains or losses also include funding valuation adjustments (FVA) relating to uncollateralized derivative assets, which represents the gains or losses (including hedges) attributable to the impact of changes in expected funding exposures and funding spreads. The table below presents information about CVA and FVA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$(289 |
) |
|
|
$ 371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 196 |
|
|
|
$ 177 |
| Bifurcated Embedded Derivatives The table below presents the fair value and the notional amount of derivatives that have been bifurcated from their related borrowings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
As of December |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 1,148 |
|
Fair value of liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,717 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$11,003 |
| In the table above, derivatives that have been bifurcated from their related borrowings are recorded at fair value and primarily consist of interest rate, equity and commodity products. These derivatives are included in unsecured short- and long-term borrowings, as well as other secured financings, with the related borrowings. Derivatives with Credit-Related Contingent Features Certain of the firm’s derivatives have been transacted under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require the firm to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in the firm’s credit ratings. The firm assesses the impact of these bilateral agreements by determining the collateral or termination payments that would occur assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies. A downgrade by any one rating agency, depending on the agency’s relative ratings of the firm at the time of the downgrade, may have an impact which is comparable to the impact of a downgrade by all rating agencies. The table below presents information about net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements (excluding collateral posted), the fair value of collateral posted and additional collateral or termination payments that could have been called by counterparties in the event of a one- or two-notch downgrade in the firm’s credit ratings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
As of December |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
Net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$32,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$28,510 |
|
Additional collateral or termination payments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 1,268 |
| The firm applies hedge accounting for (i) certain interest rate swaps used to manage the interest rate exposure of certain fixed-rate unsecured long- and short-term borrowings and certain fixed-rate certificates of deposit, (ii) foreign exchange forward contracts used to manage the foreign exchange risk of certain securities and (iii) certain foreign currency forward contracts and foreign currency-denominated debt used to manage foreign currency exposures on the firm’s net investment in certain non-U.S. operations. To qualify for hedge accounting, the hedging instrument must be highly effective at reducing the risk from the exposure being hedged. Additionally, the firm must formally document the hedging relationship at inception and assess the hedging relationship at least on a quarterly basis to ensure the hedging instrument continues to be highly effective over the life of the hedging relationship. The firm designates certain interest rate swaps as fair value hedges of certain fixed-rate unsecured long- and short-term debt and fixed-rate certificates of deposit. These interest rate swaps hedge changes in fair value attributable to the designated benchmark interest rate (e.g., London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), Secured Overnight Financing Rate or Overnight Index Swap Rate), effectively converting a substantial portion of fixed-rate obligations into floating-rate obligations. The firm applies a statistical method that utilizes regression analysis when assessing the effectiveness of these hedging relationships in achieving offsetting changes in the fair values of the hedging instrument and the risk being hedged (i.e., interest rate risk). An interest rate swap is considered highly effective in offsetting changes in fair value attributable to changes in the hedged risk when the regression analysis results in a coefficient of determination of 80% or greater and a slope between 80% and 125%. For qualifying fair value hedges, gains or losses on derivatives are included in interest expense. The change in fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged is reported as an adjustment to its carrying value (hedging adjustment) and is also included in interest expense. When a derivative is no longer designated as a hedge, any remaining difference between the carrying value and par value of the hedged item is amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the hedged item using the effective interest method. See Note 23 for further information about interest income and interest expense. The table below presents the gains/(losses) from interest rate derivatives accounted for as hedges and the related hedged borrowings and deposits, and total interest expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3,196 |
|
|
|
$ (1,854 |
) |
Hedged borrowings and deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (3,657 |
) |
|
|
$ 1,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$17,376 |
|
|
|
$15,912 |
| The table below presents the carrying value of deposits and unsecured borrowings that are designated in a hedging relationship and the related cumulative hedging adjustment (increase/(decrease)) from current and prior hedging relationships included in such carrying values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
Cumulative Hedging Adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured long-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 19,634 |
|
|
|
$ 200 |
|
Unsecured short-term borrowings |
|
|
$ 6,008 |
|
|
|
$ 28 |
|
Unsecured long-term borrowings |
|
|
$ 87,874 |
|
|
|
$ 7,292 |
| In the table above, cumulative hedging adjustment included $6.34 billion as of December 2020 and $3.48 billion as of December 2019 of hedging adjustments from prior hedging relationships that were de-designated and substantially all were related to unsecured long-term borrowings. In addition, cumulative hedging adjustments for items no longer designated in a hedging relationship were $489 million as of December 2020 and $425 million as of December 2019 and substantially all were related to unsecured long-term borrowings. During 2020, the firm designated certain foreign exchange forward contracts as fair value hedges of the foreign exchange risk of certain securities included in investments. The carrying value of such securities was $2.09 billion as of December 2020. The effectiveness of such hedges is assessed based on changes in spot rates. The losses on the hedges (relating to both spot and forward points) were $112 million and the gains on the related available-for-sale securities were $110 million, and were included in market making for 2020. The firm seeks to reduce the impact of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on its net investments in certain non-U.S. operations through the use of foreign currency forward contracts and foreign currency-denominated debt. For foreign currency forward contracts designated as hedges, the effectiveness of the hedge is assessed based on the overall changes in the fair value of the forward contracts (i.e., based on changes in forward rates). For foreign currency-denominated debt designated as a hedge, the effectiveness of the hedge is assessed based on changes in spot rates. For qualifying net investment hedges, all gains or losses on the hedging instruments are included in currency translation. The table below presents the gains/(losses) from net investment hedging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 6 |
|
|
|
$577 |
|
Foreign currency-denominated debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$(19 |
) |
|
|
$ (50 |
) | Gains or losses on individual net investments in non-U.S. operations are reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) when such net investments are sold or substantially liquidated. The gross and net gains and losses on hedges and the related net investments in non-U.S. operations reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income for 2020 was $61 million (reflecting a gain of $214 million related to hedges and a loss of $153 million on the related net investments in non-U.S. operations). The gross and net gains and losses reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income were not material for both 2019 and 2018. The firm had designated $4.97 billion as of December 2020 and $3.05 billion as of December 2019 of foreign currency-denominated debt, included in unsecured long- and short-term borrowings, as hedges of net investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries.
|